1 Bennett Evan Cooper, Steptoe & Johnson LLP, Phoenix, Arizona William K. Teresa Nelson, Saint Paul, Minnesota, for amicus curiae American Civil Liberties Union of Minnesota.
McGrath, Institute for Justice, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for appellants. Garry, Best & Flanagan LLP, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for respondent. Filed: JOffice of Appellate Courts Jason Wiebesick, Appellant, Jacki Wiebesick, Appellant, Jessie Treseler, Appellant, Tiffani Simons, Appellant. In re the Application for an Administrative Search Warrant, City of Golden Valley, Respondent, vs. STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A15-1795 Court of Appeals Lillehaug, J. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that the Minnesota Constitution does not require individualized suspicion of a code violation to support an administrative search warrant for a rental housing inspection. The district court denied the petition for the administrative search warrant, concluding that the issuance of such a search warrant was foreclosed without suspicion of a code violation. In this case, the City of Golden Valley petitioned the district court for an administrative search warrant to search rental property for compliance with the city code. Camara held that an administrative warrant satisfies the probable cause requirement if reasonable legislative or administrative standards for conducting an unconsented-to rental housing inspection are satisfied with respect to a particular dwelling.
523 (1967) and hold that Minnesota’s constitution requires that an administrative search warrant be supported by probable cause of the sort required in a criminal investigation. The Supreme Court declined Appellants’ invitation to depart from the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Camara v.
0 kommentar(er)
